On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2014-08-18 12:50:27 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> > You realize that you can pretty much recompute the offsets from the
>> > sizes of the individual allocations anyway?
>>
>> Sure, if you know the segment base. Do you?
>
> Err? The offset doesn't give you the base either?
Oh!
I thought you were printing actual pointer addresses. If you're just
printing offsets relative to wherever the segment happens to be
mapped, I don't care about that.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company