Re: QSoC proposal: Rewrite pg_dump and pg_restore

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: QSoC proposal: Rewrite pg_dump and pg_restore
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoayeXCjYfv++0s14+fW7086WG6SCh20e=Huqu+zA3f6gQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: QSoC proposal: Rewrite pg_dump and pg_restore  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: QSoC proposal: Rewrite pg_dump and pg_restore  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> Here's how I think it needs to look:
>> [ move all the functionality to the backend ]
>
> Of course, after you've done all that work, you've got something that is
> of exactly zero use to its supposed principal use-case, pg_dump.  pg_dump
> will still have to support server versions that predate all these fancy
> new dump functions, and that pretty much ensures that most of pg_dump's
> core functionality will still be on the client side.  Or, if you try to
> finesse that problem by making sure the new server APIs correspond to
> easily-identified pieces of pg_dump code, you'll probably end up with APIs
> that nobody else wants to use :-(.

It's worse than that.  If you put all the logic in the server, then a
dump taken on an older version won't be able to quote keywords added
in the newer version.  Go directly to fail.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Greg Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: jsonb and nested hstore
Следующее
От: Rajashree Mandaogane
Дата:
Сообщение: Creating tables for columns