On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net> wrote:
>> I feel that if there is no memory pressure, frankly it doesnt matter much
>> about what gets out and what not. The case I am specifically targeting is
>> when the clocksweep gets to move about a lot i.e. high memory pressure
>> workloads. Of course, I may be totally wrong here.
>
> Well, there's either memory pressure or there isn't. If there isn't then
> it's all moot *because we're not evicting anything*.
I don't think that's really true. A workload can fit within
shared_buffers at some times and spill beyond it at others. Every
time it fits within shared_buffers for even a short period of time,
the reference count of any buffer that's not ice-cold goes to 5 and we
essentially lose all knowledge of which buffers are relatively hotter.Then, when we spill out again, evictions are
random.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company