Re: [HACKERS] Inadequate parallel-safety check for SubPlans

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Inadequate parallel-safety check for SubPlans
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoatnWS5V-aYzSH-b6ruO1ifWVrLr2QBadODqPSrOsnBTA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Inadequate parallel-safety check for SubPlans  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 1:24 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> FYI, I have this on my to-look-at list, and expect to fix it before Robert
>>> returns from vacation.
>
>> Let me know if an initial patch by someone else can be helpful?
>
> Sure, have a go at it.  I won't get to this for a day or so ...

Thanks to both of you.  I appreciate the help.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Inadequate parallel-safety check for SubPlans
Следующее
От: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Should pg_current_wal_location() becomepg_current_wal_lsn()