Re: Foreign key isolation tests
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Foreign key isolation tests |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmoaqt3vPRH5ZyGov5ZJeL+Kpy7pf6mtsz-QvthPuu91yPw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Foreign key isolation tests (Paul A Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Foreign key isolation tests
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 7:26 PM Paul A Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com> wrote: > Thanks for taking a look! Here are new patches with those extra tests. > There are extensive regress tests already, so I just tested the same > concurrency pattern. I think the results are okay. I do get a > can't-serialize exception for a couple valid changes under REPEATABLE > READ and SERIALIZE, but I think they are expected and not a bug. (I > think you would see the same thing outside of FKs.) 0001 and 0003 look OK to me on a quick read-through. 0002 seems to do something horrible to isolation_schedule. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: