On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 5:05 AM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki
<tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
>> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Tom Lane
> FWIW, I'm pretty much -1 on messing with the timing of the socket close
>> actions. I broke that once within recent memory, so maybe I'm gun-shy,
>> but I think that the odds of unpleasant side effects greatly outweigh any
>> likely benefit there.
>
> I couldn't find any relevant mails in pgsql-hackers. I found no problem with the attached patch. Do you think this
isOK?
I have no opinion on this patch, because I haven't reviewed it, but
note recent commit 3b90e38c5d592ea8ec8236287dd5c749fc041728, which
appears to be semi-related.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company