Re: Shmem queue is not flushed if receiver is not yet attached

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Shmem queue is not flushed if receiver is not yet attached
Дата
Msg-id CA+Tgmoaj5eAG4KeTQJNfX1=v=5WQcH7Gqvav7Tb1OpGU_EVqCA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Shmem queue is not flushed if receiver is not yet attached  (Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 3:06 AM Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think that this patch is basically correct, except that it's not
>> correct to set mqh_counterparty_attached when receiver is still NULL.
>> Here's a v2 where I've attempted to correct that while preserving the
>> essence of your proposed fix.
>
> This looks good to me,

Thanks for checking. Committed.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: "ERROR: latch already owned" on gharial
Следующее
От: Aleksander Alekseev
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson