On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> wrote:
> It seems like a useful function to have, but perhaps it should just be
> called trim() rather than numeric_trim(), for consistency with the
> names of the other numeric functions, which don't start with
> "numeric_".
That wouldn't work in this case, because we have hard-coded parser
productions for TRIM().
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company