On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> So I think this is just an excuse for turning --no-security-labels
>> into --no-object-property=security-label. To me, that's just plain
>> worse.
>
> It does not seem that my thoughts here have been correctly transmitted
> to your brain.
Dang, we really should have put more work into that inter-brain link.
PostgreSQL group mind FTW!
> I do not mean to change the user-facing options, just
> to refactor the code internally so as --no-foo switches can be more
> easily generated, added and handled as they are associated with an
> object type. A portion of the complains is caused by the fact that a
> lot of similar code is duplicated.
Ah, well. No objection to refactoring away duplicate code, of course.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers