Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmoaf2W0ZyGuxP-wyPkZBFx5+qa92S79LjynOuLnf3=dp-Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs (Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 4:03 PM Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com> wrote: > Admittedly I'm a bit late into this discussion so I may be off base. > Ultimately we need to negotiate the protocol. From what I can tell for libpq we are providing a function that returns anumber, currently 3. > > The proposal is to change it to something like 30000. > > Ultimately this has to go over the wire so that clients that are implementing the protocol themselves can respond to thenew behaviour. > > Wouldn't we have to send this number in the protocol negotiation ? See the discussion of the NegotiateProtocolVersion message which has been around for a long time but is still not supported by all clients. https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/protocol.html https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/protocol-message-formats.html No changes to the format of that message are proposed. The startup message also contains a version number, and changes the format of that message are also not proposed. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: