Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoaYuAbFviV2CvFkct9k3wGR+cVdyOMUnS=c=ZPG0aDD7w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> One problem is that it makes for misleading results if you try to
>> benchmark 9.5 against 9.6.
>
> You need a really beefy box to show the problem. On a large/new 2 socket
> machine the performance regression in in the 1-3% range for a pgbench of
> SELECT 1. So it's not like it's immediately showing up for everyone.
>
> Putting it on the open items list sounds good to me.

Well, OK, I've done that then.  I don't really agree that it's not a
problem; the OP said he saw a 3x regression, and some of my colleagues
doing benchmarking are complaining about this commit, too.  It doesn't
seem like much of a stretch to think that it might be affecting other
people as well.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: GinPageIs* don't actually return a boolean
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH v4] GSSAPI encryption support