On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
> -Patch- -tps@-c1- -tps@-c2- -tps@-c8- -WAL@-c8-
> HEAD,-F80 816 1644 6528 1821 MiB
> xlogscale,-F80 824 1643 6551 1826 MiB
> xlogscale+lz,-F80 717 1466 5924 1137 MiB
> xlogscale+lz,-F100 753 1508 5948 1548 MiB
Ouch. I've been pretty excited by this patch, but I don't think we
want to take an "optimization" that produces a double-digit hit at 1
client and doesn't gain even at 8 clients. I'm surprised this is
costing that much, though. It doesn't seem like it should.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company