On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 2:00 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> On 2015/12/22 15:24, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> As this debate continues, I think that moving this patch to the next
>>> CF would make the most sense then.. So done this way.
>>
>> Perhaps, this ended (?) with the following commit:
>>
>> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=385f337c9f39b21dca96ca4770552a10a6d5af24
>
> Ah, thanks! What has been committed is actually more or less
> epq-recheck-v6-efujita.patch posted upthread, I'll mark the patch as
> committed then.
+1. And thanks.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company