On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Alexander Korotkov
<a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> BTW, you didn't comment Tom's suggestion about dropping high-order bit which
> trades minor user user confusion to minor loss of precision.
Oh, I thought I did comment on that. I favor allowing negative IDs
rather than minor loss of precision.
> TBH, for me it's not so important whether we allow negative queryIds or drop
> high-order bit. I would be anyway very good to have 64-(or 63-)bit queryIds
> committed.
Great.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers