Re: Set visibility map bit after HOT prune
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Set visibility map bit after HOT prune |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoaU6UtjaqVb4+kqrUaZ_pcDXVjMtoOEhwb_T93r+qse+A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Set visibility map bit after HOT prune (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > ISTM that if someone spots a block that could use cleanup, they mark > the block as BM_PIN_COUNT_WAITER, but don't set pid. Then when they > unpin the block they send a signal/queue work for a special cleaning > process to come in and do the work now that nobody is waiting. Logic > would allow VACUUMs to go past that by setting the pid. If we > prioritised cleanup onto blocks that are already dirty we would > minimise I/O. I don't favor that particular signaling mechanism, but I agree that there is quite a bit of potential utility in having foreground processes notice that work (like a HOT prune, or setting the VM bit) needs to be done and pass those requests off to a background process. I'm hoping the new background worker framework in 9.3 will make that sort of thing easier for people to play around with. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: