Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoaRTWGYYXP-LhOv91DyS5xrjR55uo9wNG7FiNjqP1j+sQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Ответы Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Список pgsql-bugs
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> Even if we can't sneak amcheck into 9.5, if we can show that it detects the
> problem, then just being able to direct people to "get amcheck from 9.6 if
> you want to check if the reindex is necessary" would still be a strong
> improvement over nothing.

I agree that back-patching amcheck into 9.5 would be unprecedented,
but it wouldn't be crazy: shipping an extra contrib module with no
additional dependencies shouldn't break anything for existing users.

However, the fact that the patch is not "Ready for Committer" at this
point means that it is not going to be available in time for next
week's maintenance releases, or very possibly, for 9.6.  Time grows
very short.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #14042: bug, PostgreSQL not cleanup temp table info after crash.
Следующее
От: Bernd Helmle
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)