On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:14 PM, Konstantin Knizhnik
<k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> With the extension lock patch performance in increased to 1146 TPS.
> So it is much better than with vanilla postgres and about 40% better than
> with deadlock patch (1146 vs. 719 TPS).
Cool, that's good to know.
> So definitely elimination heavy weight relation extension lock is good idea
> which eliminates the need for my deadlock patch ... but only in this insert
> test.
> As I have mentioned at the beginning of this thread the same problem with
> deadlock detection timeout expiration we have with YSCB benchmark with zipf
> distribution.
> Here the source of contention are tuple locks. And as far as I understand
> from the discussion in the mentioned thread, it is not possible to eliminate
> heavy weight tuple locks.
Right, that variant would have to be solved in some other way.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company