On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 4:06 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> There is very good reason to believe that the large majority of all
> data that people store in a system like Postgres is extremely cold
> data:
The systems where I end up troubleshooting problems seem to be, most
typically, busy OLTP systems. I'm not in a position to say whether
that's more or less common than systems with extremely cold data, but
I am in a position to say that my employer will have a lot fewer happy
customers if we regress that use case. Naturally I'm keen to avoid
that.
> Having a separate aggressive step that rewrites an entire large table,
> apparently at random, is just a huge burden to users. You've said that
> you agree that it sucks, but somehow I still can't shake the feeling
> that you don't fully understand just how much it sucks.
Ha!
Well, that's possible. But maybe you don't understand how much your
patch makes other things suck.
I don't think we can really get anywhere here by postulating that the
problem is the other person's lack of understanding, even if such a
postulate should happen to be correct.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com