Re: [PATCH] Store Extension Options

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [PATCH] Store Extension Options
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoaN7ue5GNmLj4uo4Q6F5G0O0Qk-rbxQiQKvCZHaxn1C9w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] Store Extension Options  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [PATCH] Store Extension Options  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I would suggest addressing Robert's concern about lack of error checking
> by refusing to allow a custom reloption to be set unless the relevant
> extension is loaded and checks it.  Unlike the postgresql.conf problem,
> I don't see any very good use-case for allowing an unchecked ALTER TABLE
> to occur.

How do you plan to resolve the associated dump/restore hazard?  AIUI,
that's why we allow people define any old this.that GUC that they want
without checking it - because the relevant shared library might not be
loaded at the time of definition, but only by time of use.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: dynamic shared memory and locks
Следующее
От: Mark Dilger
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc. Michael Paquier