On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> A TODO for this?
You mean this part?
>> On the other hand, the problem of the FSM taking up 24kB for an 8kB
>> table seems clearly worth fixing, but I don't think I have the cycles
>> for it at present. Maybe a TODO is in order.
I certainly think that'd be worth a TODO. Whether the rest of this is
worth worrying about I'm not sure.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company