Re: strange parallel query behavior after OOM crashes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: strange parallel query behavior after OOM crashes
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoaJ1Lk4NHA+_K8T6Fq2h9op3LnTn3FpATv6Acywoh8HSQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: strange parallel query behavior after OOM crashes  (Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: strange parallel query behavior after OOM crashes
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 6:36 AM, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes. But, as Robert suggested up in the thread, we should not use
> (parallel_register_count = 0) as an alternative to define a bgworker
> crash. Hence, I've added an argument named 'wasCrashed' in
> ForgetBackgroundWorker to indicate a bgworker crash.

Did you intend to attach that patch to this email?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Functions Immutable but not parallel safe?
Следующее
От: Stas Kelvich
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: logical replication worker and statistics