Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question aboutmeaning of information for explain.depesz.com

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question aboutmeaning of information for explain.depesz.com
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoaFaWQKoEAt9O1huKoQ-0ofOiOkfeUAnzY-UHyygQ2CMw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question aboutmeaning of information for explain.depesz.com  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question aboutmeaning of information for explain.depesz.com  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 9:37 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Uh, should I just revert that commit entirely first, and then we can
>> commit the new fix afterward?
>
> Yes. I have already extracted the test case of that commit to the new
> patch which is what we need from that commit.

OK, done.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Inconsistency in plpgsql's error context reports
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Parallel Index Scan vs BTP_DELETED and BTP_HALF_DEAD