Re: COMMENT on function's arguments

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: COMMENT on function's arguments
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoaCYKaBx6Y76amxLxEvWKV0_jwkuoehs_=L+ow5z9Jvhw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на COMMENT on function's arguments  (Vlad Arkhipov <arhipov@dc.baikal.ru>)
Ответы Re: COMMENT on function's arguments  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Vlad Arkhipov <arhipov@dc.baikal.ru> wrote:
> Does it make sense to have a comment on function's arguments? Of course it
> is possible to include these comments in a function's comment, but may be
> better to have them in more formalized way like comments on columns of a
> table. IDEs may use this information when providing hints for a function
> like in other languages.

This would be somewhat tricky, because our COMMENT support assumes
that the object upon which we're commenting has an ObjectAddress, and
individual arguments to a function don't, although perhaps the
sub-object-id stuff that we currently use to handle comments on table
columns could be extended to handle this case.  I guess I wouldn't
object to a well-done patch that made this work, but creating such a
patch seems likely to be tricky, owing to the fact that there's
nothing in the system that thinks of the individual arguments to a
function as separate objects at present.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Gurjeet Singh
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Patch pg_is_in_backup()
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Patch pg_is_in_backup()