On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 4:10 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:04:12AM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > There's hundreds of other internal uses of xlog that were not touched
> > either, only the user-facing parts were changed.
>
> I have heard of them ;)
> Just wondering if this one is worth renaming as the variable is
> isolated. It is not a big deal to do nothing though.
Well, if we rename the user-visible part but not the internal part,
then they don't match, which is odd.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company