On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 7:04 PM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki
<tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> So a simple improvement would be to assign workers fairly to databases facing a wraparound risk, as Sawada-san
suggested.
Is that always an improvement, or does it make some cases better and
others worse?
> One ultimate solution should be the undo-based MVCC that makes vacuuming unnecessary, which you proposed about a year
ago...
And blogged about yesterday.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company