Re: Confusing remark about UPSERT in fdwhandler.sgml

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Confusing remark about UPSERT in fdwhandler.sgml
Дата
Msg-id CA+Tgmoa-44L5_bXY0Wrt5R2Efbf6eZOnRAtYKDOBuTXn48rE3g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Confusing remark about UPSERT in fdwhandler.sgml  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Ответы Re: Confusing remark about UPSERT in fdwhandler.sgml  (Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Etsuro Fujita
> <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> ISTM that the sentence "as remote constraints are not locally known" is
>> somewhat confusing, because check constrains on remote tables can be
>> defined locally in 9.5.  How about "unique constraints or exclusion
>> constraints on remote tables are not locally known"?  Attached is a
>> patch for that.
>
> Makes sense to me.

Me, too.  Committed.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Request for dogfood volunteers (was No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So!)
Следующее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Less than ideal error reporting in pg_stat_statements