On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 2:27 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 02:11:18PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > Committed. I'm going to be 0% surprised if the buildfarm turns pretty
> > colors, but I don't know how to know what it's going to be unhappy
> > about except by trying it, so here goes.
>
> Thanks! I'll keep an eye on the buildfarm and will send any new patches
> that are needed.
Andres just pointed out to me that thorntail is unhappy:
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=thorntail&dt=2022-02-03%2019%3A54%3A42
It says:
==~_~===-=-===~_~==
pgsql.build/contrib/basic_archive/log/postmaster.log
==~_~===-=-===~_~==
2022-02-03 23:17:49.019 MSK [1253623:1] FATAL: WAL archival cannot be
enabled when wal_level is "minimal"
The notes for the machine say:
UBSan; force_parallel_mode; wal_level=minimal; OS bug breaks truncate()
So apparently we need to either skip this test when wal_level=minimal,
or force a higher wal_level to be used for this particular test. Not
sure what the existing precedents are, if any.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com