On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 3:55 PM, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think I must have forgot to save it before I emailed it...
>
> Here's the correct version.
Ah ha. Looks better.
I'm working on getting this committed now. Aside from some stylistic
things, I've found one serious functional bug, which is that you need
to test padding != 0, not padding > 0, when deciding which path to
take. No need to send a new patch, I've already fixed it in my local
copy...
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company