On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 10:52 AM Nathan Bossart
<nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
> IMHO superuser should typically only be mentioned when it is the only way
> to do something. Since superusers have all privileges, I think logs like
> "superuser or privileges of X" are kind of redundant. If Robert has
> privileges of X, we wouldn't say "privileges of X or Robert." We'd just
> point to X. Ultimately, I feel like mentioning superuser in error messages
> usually just makes the message longer without adding any useful
> information.
That's kind of my opinion too, but I'm not sure whether there are
cases where it will lead to confusion.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com