Re: On disable_cost
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: On disable_cost |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZuaSX-FFvch0t5nvcBXk2c0O60gBRwx4w6zvBx-=oDPA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: On disable_cost (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: On disable_cost
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Oct 5, 2024 at 1:37 AM David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for explaining your point of view. I've not shifted my opinion > any, so I guess we just disagree. I feel a strong enough dislike for > the current EXPLAIN output to feel it's worth working harder to have a > better output. > > I won't push my point any further unless someone else appears > supporting Laurenz and I. Thank you for working on getting rid of the > disabled_cost. I think what we have is now much better than before. > The EXPLAIN output is the only part I dislike about this work. > > I'd encourage anyone else on the sidelines who has an opinion on how > to display the disabled-ness of a plan node in EXPLAIN to speak up > now, even if it's just a +1 to something someone has already written. > It would be nice to see what more people think. I think you have adequate consensus to proceed with this. I'd just ask that you don't disappear completely if it turns out that there are problems. I accept that my commit created this problem and I'm certainly willing to be involved too if we need to sort out more things. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: