Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog

On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> - Rename them, hard break is OK: Michael P, Bruce, Stephen (depends on
> David's input),  Magnus

I'm in favor of this.  But I don't like Peter's proposal to use a more
complicated structure.  As for the new names, how about pg_wal and
pg_xact?  I don't think "pg_trans" is as good; is it transactional or
transient or transport or transitive or what?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company