Re: Explanation for bug #13908: hash joins are badly broken

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Explanation for bug #13908: hash joins are badly broken
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoZgKkvvmTjPbqRyCsnKM6KK8c_0P=NdQjDTTMDs2ykpew@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Explanation for bug #13908: hash joins are badly broken  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Explanation for bug #13908: hash joins are badly broken  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> So I'm of the opinion that a great deal more work is needed here.
> But it's not something we're going to be able to get done for 9.5.1,
> or realistically 9.5.anything.  Whereas adding additional klugery to
> ExecHashRemoveNextSkewBucket probably is doable over the weekend.

Tom, are you taking care of this, or should I be getting involved here?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Way to check whether a particular block is on the shared_buffer?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Explanation for bug #13908: hash joins are badly broken