On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 8:06 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 21 December 2015 at 12:54, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Is there anything in the below section which has been been implemented
>> > or
>> > rendered irrelevant by BRIN indexes?
>> >
>> > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Indexes
>> >
>> > "Consider smaller indexes that record a range of values per heap page,
>> > rather than having one index entry for every heap row"
>>
>> [ catching up on old threads ]
>>
>> BRIN is exactly this, isn't it? Well, moreso: it's a range of values
>> for a range of heap pages.
>
> It's close, but not the same.
>
> BRIN is a summary index and so could never support uniqueness.
Hmm, but that Todo wording seems to suggest a summary index, so I
don't think that proposal would support uniqueness either.
> It's also possible to have an index type that has a precise TID entry, yet a
> more compact format, which would then allow unique values. This would be
> similar to the way SQLServer compresses primary key indexes.
True. But would that require a new index type, or would we do that
just by optimizing btree?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company