Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoZaHTH=q9eyyeBk3DYBmEmPQoc_oTafMxfeqoye+ioeZg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables  (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>)
Ответы Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 3:29 PM Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> wrote:
> I'm still hopeful we get to advance this early in 16 because I think
> everyone agrees the feature would be great.

I'm not saying this patch can't make progress, but I think the chances
of this being ready to commit any time in the v16 release cycle, let
alone at the beginning, are low. This patch set has been around since
2019, and here Andres and I are saying it's not even really reviewable
in the shape that it's in. I have done some review of it previously,
BTW, but eventually I gave up because it just didn't seem like we were
making any progress. And then a long time after that people were still
finding many server crashes with relatively simple test cases.

I agree that the feature is desirable, but I think getting there is
going to require a huge amount of effort that may amount to a total
rewrite of the patch.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: casting operand to proper type in BlockIdGetBlockNumber
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_stop_backup() v2 incorrectly marked as proretset