Re: pgsql: Restrict the use of temporary namespace in two-phase transaction

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: pgsql: Restrict the use of temporary namespace in two-phase transaction
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoZaCNTxXzV76zuyMuc8N9vU6RgEhVu8t9dXDcKqThUW7A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: pgsql: Restrict the use of temporary namespace in two-phase transaction  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: pgsql: Restrict the use of temporary namespace in two-phase transaction  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 8:08 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > Anyway, it seems to me that this is pointing out to another issue:
> > current_schema() can trigger a namespace creation, hence shouldn't we
> > mark it as PARALLEL UNSAFE and make sure that we never run into this
> > problem?
>
> That seems a bit annoying, but maybe we have little choice?

The only other option I see is to make current_schema() not trigger a
namespace creation.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] pgbench tap tests fail if the path contains a perl special character
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing