On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 05:04:14PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>> > Slightly improved patch applied.
>>
>> Is it?
>
> The patch has a slightly modified 'if' statement to check a constant
> before calling a function, and use elseif:
>
> < + if (!interpretOidsOption(stmt->options, true) && cxt.hasoids)
> ---
> > + if (cxt.hasoids && !interpretOidsOption(stmt->options, true))
> 47c57
> < + if (interpretOidsOption(stmt->options, true) && !cxt.hasoids)
> ---
> > + else if (!cxt.hasoids && interpretOidsOption(stmt->options, true))
>
> I realize the change is subtle.
What I meant was - I didn't see an attachment on that message.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company