Re: [HACKERS] Change in "policy" on dump ordering?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Change in "policy" on dump ordering?
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoZZXEHpz_pKOSfArkWpU6WDd55NoV8=1-sNiZxY1kqMzQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Change in "policy" on dump ordering?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Change in "policy" on dump ordering?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> The bigger issue is whether there's some failure case this would cause
> that I'm missing altogether.  Thoughts?

I think dependencies are fundamentally the right model for this sort
of problem.  I can't imagine what could go wrong that wouldn't amount
to a failure to insert all of the right dependencies, and thus be
fixable by inserting whatever was missing.

It's possible I am lacking in imagination, so take that opinion for
what it's worth.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows
Следующее
От: Mark Rofail
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays