On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 7:43 AM Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:
> So, from my perspective, we should never have let FOR SELECT policies
> mess with an UPDATE. But I am too late for that; such a change would
> be way too invasive now. So I'd like to introduce a "back door" by
> creating a FOR SELECT policy with WITH CHECK (TRUE).
In principle I see no problem with some kind of back door here, but
that seems like it might not be the right way to do it. I don't think
we want constant true to behave arbitrarily differently than any other
expression. Maybe that's not what you had in mind and I'm just not
seeing the full picture, though.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com