Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoZTLKtQ9UCGo4zU1kzrCBxUE_iEwxeNNbDT5OCjRVXRxg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation  (Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
>> + *        ExecAppendEstimate
>> + *
>> + *        estimates the space required to serialize Append node.
>>
>> Ugh, this is wrong, but I notice it follows various other
>> equally-wrong comments for other parallel-aware node types. I guess
>> I'll go fix that.  We are not in serializing the Append node.
>
> I didn't clealy get this. Do you think it should be "space required to
> copy the Append node into the shared memory" ?

No, because the Append node is *NOT* getting copied into shared
memory.  I have pushed a comment update to the existing functions; you
can use the same comment for this patch.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Fix typo in blvacuum.c