On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Vinayak <vinpokale@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the v7.
> Please check the comment below.
> -Table name in the vacuum progress
>
> + snprintf(progress_message[0], PROGRESS_MESSAGE_LENGTH, "%s.%s",
> schemaname,relname);
Uh, I hope that line doesn't appear in the patch. We're scarcely
likely to commit anything that has such an obvious SQL-injection risk
built into it.
https://xkcd.com/327/
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company