Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoZR5vQbntp7Ff10jMqtoguZHR1BmHS_POgxVX-9u0Dm4w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Ответы Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
>>> <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Are you saying you would accept the patch if we had this?
>>>
>>>> I think I would still be uncomfortable with the hacks in the page header.
>>>
>>> There are no "hacks". There are some carefully designed changes with
>>> input from multiple people, including yourself, and it copes as
>>> gracefully as it can with backwards compatibility requirements.
>>
>> You have comments from three different people, all experienced
>> hackers, disagreeing with this position;
>
> Who is the third person you speak of? Perhaps they will speak again if
> they wish to be heard.

Tom Lane.  It was the very first email posted in response to the very
first version of this patch you ever posted.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thom Brown
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: LIST OWNED BY...
Следующее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2