Re: Inaccurate results from numeric ln(), log(), exp() and pow()

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Inaccurate results from numeric ln(), log(), exp() and pow()
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoZQiQ1JDfieFXaPPMtX7iG3N9fKf6=8vvOC25Wa58VCUQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Inaccurate results from numeric ln(), log(), exp() and pow()  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Inaccurate results from numeric ln(), log(), exp() and pow()  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> This patch, or something nearby, seems to have changed the number of
>> significant figures produced by log() and maybe some of the other
>> functions this patch touched.
>
> Yeah, not surprising.
>
>> It's certainly not obvious from the commit message that this change
>> was expected.
>
> That's on me as author of the commit message, I guess.  The rscale
> in most of these functions is exactly the number of fraction digits
> that will be emitted, and we changed the rules for computing it.
> Not by much, in most cases.  I don't think we should be too worried
> about being bug-compatible with the old behavior.

It seems to be a loss of 4 digits in every case I've seen.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Caleb Welton
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bootstrap DATA is a pita
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Inaccurate results from numeric ln(), log(), exp() and pow()