On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Dimitri Fontaine
<dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote:
> Please find it attached to this email.
Nice clean patch, thanks!
Committed, after tinkering with the CommandCounterIncrement() stuff a bit.
I will respond to the rest of your email later. Reading through this
patch left me with a slight concern regarding both ddl_command_start
and ddl_command_end: what happens if there's more than one event
trigger scheduled to fire, and one of them does something like drop
(with cascade) the function that a later one uses? Admittedly, that
seems like an unlikely case, but we probably want to check that
nothing too awful happens (e.g. crashing the server) and maybe add a
regression test to cover this scenario.
Another thing is that we might want to document that if a command
errors out, ddl_command_end will never be reached; and perhaps also
that if ddl_command_start errors out, the command itself will never be
reached. Perhaps this is so obvious as to not bear mentioning, I
don't know, but the thought crossed my mind that someone might fail to
realize it.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company