Re: WITH CHECK and Column-Level Privileges
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: WITH CHECK and Column-Level Privileges |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+TgmoZO-9jHu9FM_=xPt+2HLUzcmL=waw8qDBAe-zcb+ijcBQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: WITH CHECK and Column-Level Privileges (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: WITH CHECK and Column-Level Privileges
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: > suggestions. If the user does not have table-level SELECT rights, > they'll see for the "Failing row contains" case, they'll get: > > Failing row contains (col1, col2, col3) = (1, 2, 3). > > Or, if they have no access to any columns: > > Failing row contains () = () I haven't looked at the code, but that sounds nice, except that if they have no access to any columns, I'd leave the message out altogether instead of emitting it with no useful content. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: