Re: [PATCH] Store Extension Options

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [PATCH] Store Extension Options
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoZLe9Muwjz-5=RqXGwqq=4tMeJP0FB4Z6RnyG6+XBHRqQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] Store Extension Options  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [PATCH] Store Extension Options  (Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com>)
Re: [PATCH] Store Extension Options  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> I would suggest addressing Robert's concern about lack of error checking
>>> by refusing to allow a custom reloption to be set unless the relevant
>>> extension is loaded and checks it.  Unlike the postgresql.conf problem,
>>> I don't see any very good use-case for allowing an unchecked ALTER TABLE
>>> to occur.
>
>> How do you plan to resolve the associated dump/restore hazard?
>
> pg_dump creates extensions before tables, no?  So what dump/restore
> hazard?

Creating the extension doesn't guarantee that the shared library will
always be loaded.  If nothing else, think about partial restores.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: dynamic shared memory and locks
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [ANNOUNCE] IMCS: In Memory Columnar Store for PostgreSQL