On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:57 AM, David Rowley
<david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> I noticed that a comment in get_partition_dispatch_recurse claims that:
>
> "it contains the
> * leaf partition's position in the global list *leaf_part_oids minus 1"
>
> The "minus 1" part is incorrect. It simply just stores the 0-based
> index of the item in the list. I was going to fix it by removing just
> that part, but instead, I ended up rewriting the whole thing.
I think that's clearer. Committed with a few tweaks that are
hopefully improvements.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company