Re: Creation of wiki page for open items of v11

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Creation of wiki page for open items of v11
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoZGSUbfy33mQdsVy7aWKnjAYXw5AakbjWEU-ppOODtHtA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Creation of wiki page for open items of v11  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Creation of wiki page for open items of v11  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:53 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 6:53 PM, Peter Eisentraut
>> <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>> Do people find it useful to move the resolved items to a separate
>>> section on the page, instead of just removing them?  I'm not sure that
>>> the resolved sections are useful, compared to just using the git log.
>
>> If we have a section for resolved items, we can keep track of all
>> items. If we just delete the resolved items, we wouldn't know if it
>> was a mistake or it was intentional removal.
>
> It's not that much work to move the items rather than remove them,
> so I'd vote for keeping up the practice.  It has some value in terms
> of tracking activity.
>
> What *does* take time is adding a link to the commit, so I'd happily
> drop that step.  As Peter says, you can usually look in the commit
> log if you care.

The trouble is that sometimes it's not very obvious which commit log
entry relates to which open item.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 'make check' fails
Следующее
От: Chapman Flack
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: lazy detoasting