Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I'm starting to like the approach of reverting the entire transition
>> tables patch.  Failing to consider the possibility of a plan with
>> multiple ModifyTable nodes seems like a pretty fundamental design
>> mistake, and I'm not eager either to ship this with that broken or try
>> to fix it at this stage of the release cycle.
>
> Postponing the feature to v11 might be a viable solution.  We don't
> have any other major work that depends on it do we?

I don't think anything that depends on it was committed to v10.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company