Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoZ9nHJw3XkKFG2+vt1e3udPYfBiu+y=PbLH1v5RhswVEA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Yeah, I find that unlikely as well.  But leaving Asserts in place would
>>> tell us.
>
>> OK.  Should I go do that, or are you all over it?
>
> Go for it.

OK, done.  Any other thoughts on the rest of what I wrote?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: CASE w/out ELSE hides typmod (was: How define a view that use a case operator for geometry field)
Следующее
От: Merlin Moncure
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: TOAST versus VACUUM, or "missing chunk number 0 for toast value" identified