Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoZ7S4mpRc0Nko-0Ab8v7RAH4mQnwijCiYiFO5jqh4jsHA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 4:38 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> But in case a user has written an = operator which returns true for
> two NULL values, per description in [1], that comparison operator is
> flawed and
> using that operator is going to result in SQL-standard-incompliant
> behaviour. I have tried to preserve all the relevant portions of
> discussion in this mail. Am I missing something?

Yes.  You're confusing friendly advice about how to write good SQL
with internals documentation about how the system actually works.  The
documentation we have about how operator classes and index methods and
so forth actually work under the hood is in
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/xindex.html -- as a
developer, that's what you should be looking at.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Preliminary results for proposed new pgindent implementation